B"H

Tanya for Friday, 28 Cheshvan, 5771 - November 5, 2010

Tanya
As Divided for a Regular Year

Tanya for 28 Cheshvan

27 Cheshvan, 5771 - November 4, 201029 Cheshvan, 5771 - November 6, 2010


Kuntres Acharon - Essay Two

Examine the statement in Etz Chayim, Shaar HaNekudot, Shaar 8, ch. 6: that there can be no "turning of face to face" except through mitzvot requiring action.

[The text cited had previously discussed the stage of creation at which

  1. the bracket of six Sefirot known collectively as Za (Z'eir Anpin), and

  2. the Sefirah of Malchut, [1] were first emanated and revealed (in the World of Atzilut) from Chochmah and Binah, their spiritual parents.

Adam had not yet been created and hence the avodah of fulfilling mitzvot did not yet exist.

At this stage, if Za and Malchut had united "face to face," there would be an effusion of Divine energy from the innermost aspect of Za to the innermost aspect of Malchut.

This, however, would enable the kelipot to receive more than their due share of life-giving influence from the source of holiness.

The union was therefore merely "back to back," i.e., only the external aspect of Za was drawn down to Malchut.

Only after Adam was created and performed mitzvot, effectively "trimming and hacking off the thorns," i.e., limiting the nurture of kelipot, could Za and Malchut be united "face to face."

In other words, Divinity can be revealed within this world (without any nurture being illegitimately diverted to the kelipot) only by means of mitzvot whose performance entails an actual deed.]

The reason for this, [as given there in Etz Chayim], is that by means of good deeds one brings about a Supernal Union, [causing Za and Malchut to turn "face to face."]

Now, why only mitzvot involving action?

[Why can the same result not be brought about by mitzvot fulfilled by thought and speech?]

This may be understood in the light of what is written in [Etz Chayim,] Shaar Ma'n Uma'd, [2] that first, [before the Supernal Union takes place], there must be an elevation of mayin nukvin [i.e., an arousal initiated by the recipient] from the nukva [i.e., the feminine element] of Za, [iz., Malchut], and the mayin nukvin of nukva [is the state of action], as explained there, in chapter 1.

[In other words: The things of this world, whose source is the Sefirah of Malchut (which is the nukva of Za) must be elevated to their source in holiness.

This can be accomplished only through mitzvot whose fulfillment requires actions performed with the material components of the world.

This alone makes possible the Supernal Union which reveals Divinity within this world.

But how can it be ensured that no part of this revelation will leak to the kelipot (which are also known as chitzonim - lit., "extraneous forces")?

In response to this question the Alter Rebbe explains]:

Good deeds are described as trimming and hacking off the thistles that attach themselves to the hinderpart, which is the state of deed, as is written in [Etz Chayim,] Shaar 47, ch. 5.

[It is the performance of specifically these commandments that hacks away the kelipot which, like the unchecked roots of thistles or weeds in a vineyard, would otherwise encroach on the lifegiving waters and divert them from their intended destination.]

This [pruning is effected] by elevating the element of good that is concealed in them [i.e., in things of this world that are related to Asiyah] and that is enclothed in mitzvot of action, [elevating this element of good] to its source, to the sanctity of Atzilut that has already been refined.

[The performance of practical mitzvot thus makes possible the purification and elevation of those physical things that are in need of this, by extracting the element of good that is within them and elevating it to holiness.]

As to the statement there that Adam effected rectification [tikkun] through prayer as well, [which would not appear to be a mitzvah requiring action], this means [that he did so] through uttering the letters of speech, [i.e., not through the intent of prayer, but by the actual deed involved], for the movement of one's lips is also deemed a deed. [3]

For they - [these utterances] - derive from the vivifying soul which is in one's body and blood, whose root [and life-force] is in [kelipat] nogah.

[As the Alter Rebbe explains in chapter 37 of Tanya, one's G-dly soul is incapable of uttering the words of Torah or prayer (which have to be sounded with the physical mouth, tongue and teeth), except through the agency of the vivifying soul that is invested in the body.

We see from the above that uttering the words of prayer can also elevate Ma'n from the nukva of Asiyah, just as is done by the practical mitzvot.]

The acts of refinement of Asiyah that are accomplished through practical mitzvot ascend to Yetzirah by means of the Divine Name Ba'n, and from Yetzirah to Beriah and Atzilut, as noted in Shaar Ma'n, Derush 11, sec. 7.

Thus we can understand why mere thought accomplishes nothing, [as Essay 1 of Kuntres Acharon quotes above from the Zohar], for unless mayin nukvin is elevated from the "kings of nogah," [4] it is impossible to draw forth drops from above to effect the union of Zu'n, [an acronym for the above terms Za and nukva.

This elevation can be effected only through activity on the level of Asiyah, as stated above.

Za and Malchut can unite only if a degree of illumination that transcends them both, is drawn down upon them.

To use a mortal analogy:

Concerning the union of man and woman it is written, [5] "Male and female did He create them, and G-d blessed them and said to them, `Be fruitful and multiply."' I.e., in order for their union to bear fruit, a blessing must first descend upon the partners from above.

And these "drops" of blessing from a source in Divinity that transcends both Za and Malchut cannot be drawn forth unless mayin nukvin is aroused and elevated by the refinement of the materiality of kelipat nogah.]

For [Za] desires to seek its nurture from its "mother", [i.e., from the Sefirah of Binah], rather than giving forth for the lower realms.

[It is only through the elevation of Ma'n of nogah that a higher degree of illumination is drawn down within Za, causing it to desire to unite with the Sefirah beneath it, viz., Malchut], as is written in [Etz Chayim,] Shaar Ma'n, Derush 2.

Examine Zohar, Parshat Pekudei, p. 244b, which states that there is a mode...of gazing....

[Just as there is a mode of verbalized prayer, there is also a mode of prayer with kavanah by means of which one meditates and attains infinite heights, as one gazes upon the glory of the King.]

This refers to the intentions [kavanot] in worship, and the supernal unions, for those who know and understand how to "gaze...."

[Such individuals can have an impact on this world through their unarticulated intentions alone.]

For their Nefesh, Ruach and Neshamah themselves constitute [the arousal initiated by the recipient which is known as] Ma'n, through their self-sacrificing devotion for the Torah, and during the Tachanun prayer, [during which we say "To You, G-d, I lift my soul,"] as is known.

[This ability, however, remains the province of a select few.

The overwhelming majority of Jews accomplish this elevation through mitzvot of action involving an actual deed or speech.

And in this manner they are able to bring about a union "face to face" between Za and Malchut - the sublime union of Kudsha Brich Hu and His Shechinah, which draws Divinity down into this world.]

   

Notes:

  1. (Back to text) Za (as the benefactor) is termed "male", and Malchut (as the recipient) is termed "female".

    Their union - is called the union of Kudsha Brich Hu ("the Holy One, Blessed be He") and His Shechinah ("the Divine Presence").

    (The Rebbe Shlita here refers the reader to Tanya, chapter 41)

    For Za (as implied by the term kadosh) is separate from the world, while Malchut is called Shechinah (from the root meaning "to dwell") because it descends within the world.

    This union results in the revelation of Divinity within the world.

  2. (Back to text) The abbreviations ma'n and ma'd are the initials (respectively) of two Kabbalistic metaphors in Aramaic: mayin nukvin (lit., "feminine waters") and mayin d'churin (or: mayin duchrin; lit., "masculine waters").

  3. (Back to text) Sanhedrin 65a.

  4. (Back to text) As explained at length in the Kabbalah and in the literature of Chassidut, all things that are to be found in the kelipot "fell" there from the "seven kings" of the World of Tohu.

    The "kings" that "fell" into kelipat nogah are refined and elevated through man's spiritual service.

  5. (Back to text) Bereishit 5:2.



Current
  • Daily Lessons
  • Weekly Texts & Audio
  • Candle-Lighting times

    613 Commandments
  • 248 Positive
  • 365 Negative

    PDA
  • iPhone
  • Java Phones
  • BlackBerry
  • Moshiach
  • Resurrection
  • For children - part 1
  • For children - part 2

    General
  • Jewish Women
  • Holiday guides
  • About Holidays
  • The Hebrew Alphabet
  • Hebrew/English Calendar
  • Glossary

    Books
  • by SIE
  • About
  • Chabad
  • The Baal Shem Tov
  • The Alter Rebbe
  • The Rebbe Maharash
  • The Previous Rebbe
  • The Rebbe
  • Mitzvah Campaign

    Children's Corner
  • Rabbi Riddle
  • Rebbetzin Riddle
  • Tzivos Hashem

  • © Copyright 1988-2009
    All Rights Reserved
    Chassidus.org